Thursday, April 12, 2012

Fueling the Presidency


The President of the United States is running for the presidency of the United States. To that end, he is accepting donations to his campaign from his liberal supporters, those down-to-earth huddled masses who include the poor, the downtrodden, the working men and women and the unemployed on welfare, all those hating Mitt Romney because he's not only rich, but too rich.

Before you mail in your check to Obama's re-election campaign, consider this: In order to continue to lead his flock, he will travel the country making more of those (empty) promises in more of those erudite speeches written by twenty-something Harvard grads. In order to shake hands with farmers and eat lobster with fishermen, stopping at Town Halls along the way to kiss babies and thrill women with a hug, he will fly in luxury, at a cost of  $179,750 per hour, aboard Air Force One. (Talk about pain at the pump!) That cost is paid for partly by those donations to his campaign; the rest is paid by our taxes.

With 4,000 square feet of space on three levels, a private suite with an office, conference room and bath, a medical suite that can serve as an operating room and a kitchen that can provide food for 100, the accommodations are certainly comfy enough for Our Fearless Leader. This is not coach. Did I mention there were two planes; the decoy of course, in case some wacko thinks this extravagance is just plain wrong in today's poor economy.

7 comments:

  1. And that is why so many want to be President. It is a great gig if you can get it.

    GL

    ReplyDelete
  2. this is the first election cycle since 1972 that the candidates are free to raise and spend as much money for their campaign as possible. should be an interesting display! xo RS

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, it should be very interesting, but I wonder what would happen if a candidate chose to NOT break the bank out of respect to the millions of poor people they all pretend to care about? If only.....

      Delete
    2. Some how I don't see either of the candidates taking the higher road :/ ....maybe one of them will read your blog?

      Delete
    3. We need to elect BETTER PEOPLE! There have been BETTER PEOPLE running for the office in the past, but they lose because they are not handsome, not attractive, too short or not married, etc., i. e. Adlai Stevenson, Dennis Kucinich, Paul Tsongas (R.I.P.), Ralph Nader and even Ron Paul today. I bet none of those guys would even use Air Force One!

      Delete
    4. I think Ron Paul would be for unlimited campaign spending...very free market

      Delete
    5. I agree, but I bet anything he would not spend all that money to fuel his personal airplane. Surely there are better things to do with campaign funds....?

      Delete

Say Nothing

If one can believe anything reported online, things are getting pretty dicey here in America. For example, a woman was arrested in her home ...